Archive for August 2024

Are you liable for two additional taxes on your income?

Having a high income may mean you owe two extra taxes: the 3.8% net investment income tax (NIIT) and a 0.9% additional Medicare tax on wage and self-employment income. Let’s take a look at these taxes and what they could mean for you.

  1. The NIIT

In addition to income tax, this tax applies on your net investment income. The NIIT only affects taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes (AGIs) exceeding $250,000 for joint filers, $200,000 for single taxpayers and heads of household, and $125,000 for married individuals filing separately.

If your AGI is above the threshold that applies ($250,000, $200,000 or $125,000), the NIIT applies to the lesser of 1) your net investment income for the tax year, or 2) the excess of your AGI for the tax year over your threshold amount.

The “net investment income” that’s subject to the NIIT consists of interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, rents and net gains from property sales. Wage income and income from an active trade or business aren’t included. However, passive business income is subject to the NIIT.

Income that’s exempt from income tax, such as tax-exempt bond interest, is likewise exempt from the NIIT. Thus, switching some taxable investments to tax-exempt bonds can reduce your exposure. Of course, this should be done after taking your income needs and investment considerations into account.

Does the NIIT apply to home sales? Yes, if the gain is high enough. Here’s how the rules work: If you sell your principal residence, you may be able to exclude up to $250,000 of gain ($500,000 for joint filers) when figuring your income tax. This excluded gain isn’t subject to the NIIT.

However, gain that exceeds the exclusion limit is subject to the tax. Gain from the sale of a vacation home or other second residence, which doesn’t qualify for the exclusion, is also subject to the NIIT.

Distributions from qualified retirement plans, such as pension plans and IRAs, aren’t subject to the NIIT. However, those distributions may push your AGI over the threshold that would cause other types of income to be subject to the tax.

  1. The additional Medicare tax

In addition to the 1.45% Medicare tax that all wage earners pay, some high-wage earners pay an extra 0.9% Medicare tax on part of their wage income. The 0.9% tax applies to wages in excess of $250,000 for joint filers, $125,000 for married individuals filing separately and $200,000 for all others. It applies only to employees, not to employers.

Once an employee’s wages reach $200,000 for the year, the employer must begin withholding the additional 0.9% tax. However, this withholding may prove insufficient if the employee has additional wage income from another job or if the employee’s spouse also has wage income. To avoid that result, an employee may request extra income tax withholding by filing a new Form W-4 with the employer.

An extra 0.9% Medicare tax also applies to self-employment income for the tax year in excess of the same amounts for high-wage earners. This is in addition to the regular 2.9% Medicare tax on all self-employment income. The $250,000, $125,000, and $200,000 thresholds are reduced by the taxpayer’s wage income.

Mitigate the effect

As you can see, these two taxes may have a substantial effect on your tax bill. Contact us to discuss how the impact could be reduced.

© 2024

Partnerships are often used for business and investment activities. So are multi-member LLCs that are treated as partnerships for tax purposes. A major reason is that these entities offer federal income tax advantages, the most important of which is pass-through taxation. They also must follow some special and sometimes complicated federal income tax rules.

Governing documents

A partnership is governed by a partnership agreement, which specifies the rights and obligations of the entity and its partners. Similarly, an LLC is governed by an operating agreement, which specifies the rights and obligations of the entity and its members. These governing documents should address certain tax-related issues. Here are some key points when creating partnership and LLC governing documents.

Partnership tax basics

The tax numbers of a partnership are allocated to the partners. The entity issues an annual Schedule K-1 to each partner to report his or her share of the partnership’s tax numbers for the year. The partnership itself doesn’t pay federal income tax. This arrangement is called pass-through taxation, because the tax numbers from the partnership’s operations are passed through to the partners who then take them into account on their own tax returns (Form 1040 for individual partners).

Partners can deduct partnership losses passed through to them, subject to various federal income tax limitations such as the passive loss rules.

Special tax allocations

Partnerships are allowed to make special tax allocations. This is an allocation of partnership loss, deduction, income or gain among the partners that’s disproportionate to the partners’ overall ownership interests. The best measure of a partner’s overall ownership interest is the partner’s stated interest in the entity’s distributions and capital, as specified in the partnership agreement. An example of a special tax allocation is when a 50% high-tax-bracket partner is allocated 80% of the partnership’s depreciation deductions while the 50% low-tax-bracket partner is allocated only 20% of the depreciation deductions.

Any special tax allocations should be set forth in the partnership agreement. However, to make valid special tax allocations, you must comply with complicated rules in IRS regulations.

Distributions to pay partnership-related tax bills

Partners must recognize taxable income for their allocations of partnership income and gains — whether those income and gains are distributed as cash to the partners or not. Therefore, a common partnership agreement provision is one that calls for the partnership to make cash distributions to help partners cover their partnership-related tax liabilities. Of course, those liabilities will vary, depending on the partners’ specific tax circumstances. The partnership agreement should specify the protocols that will be used to calculate distributions intended to help cover partnership-related tax bills.

For instance, the protocol for long-term capital gains might call for distributions equal to 15% or 20% of each partner’s allocation of the gains.

Such distributions may be paid out in early April of each year to help cover partners’ tax liabilities from their allocations of income and gains from the previous year.

Contact us for assistance

When putting together a partnership or LLC deal, tax issues should be addressed in the agreement. Contact us to be involved in the process.

© 2024

Many employees began working remotely during the pandemic and continue doing so today. Remote work has many advantages for employers and employees, and as a result, it’s here to stay in many industries. But it may also lead to some tax surprises, especially if workers cross state lines.

Double taxation may occur

It’s not unusual for employees to work remotely for an employer in another state. For some businesses, remote work has become a permanent arrangement that allows employees to live and work further away from a physical office.

If you live in one state and work remotely for an employer in another state, familiarize yourself with the tax laws in both states and determine how they may affect you. For example, you may need to file income tax returns in both states, which could result in increased — or even double — taxation.

Here’s the problem: A state generally has the power to tax the incomes of people who are domiciled in it as well as people who reside there. Domicile is a state of mind and is often based on a person’s intent to make a location his or her “true, fixed, permanent home.” Residency is based on physical presence in a state for a certain amount of time (typically, 183 days per year).

It’s possible to be domiciled in one state and a resident of another. For example, let’s say you have a permanent home in one state where your job is located and a vacation home in another state. Your employer allows employees to work remotely, so now you spend more than 200 days per year living and working at your vacation home. The state where your permanent home is located considers you to be domiciled there, but the state where your vacation home is located views you as a resident. So you may be subject to taxes on the same income in both states. You could avoid double taxation if one or both states provide credit for tax paid to other states. But your tax bill may still increase if, for example, one state’s income tax rate is significantly higher than the other state’s rate.

Complications for employers

From an employer’s perspective, allowing employees to work remotely may create obligations to withhold and remit income and payroll taxes in several states. Plus, having employees in other states may be sufficient to establish “nexus” with those states, potentially triggering liability for their income, franchise, gross receipts, or sales and use tax. In addition to the expense of tax reporting in multiple states, this may increase an employer’s overall tax liability. There are other complications as well.

Business expense deductions

Under current law, employees generally can’t deduct unreimbursed job-related expenses. Years ago, employees could claim certain costs as miscellaneous itemized deductions, which are deductible to the extent they exceed 2% of adjusted gross income. But those deductions were eliminated for 2018 through 2025.

Remote workers typically aren’t eligible for the home office deduction either. That deduction is generally limited to self-employed business owners. Prior to 2018, employees could claim the deduction if, among other things, they worked at home “for the convenience” of their employers. But that deduction was also eliminated for 2018 through 2025.

Employers may reimburse remote workers for their business expenses according to an “accountable plan” that requires employees to substantiate expenses and meet other requirements. Properly reimbursed expenses are deductible by an employer and excludable from an employee’s income.

Be aware of the consequences

If you’re a remote worker or own a business that employs remote workers, be sure you understand the tax implications. In some cases, you may be able to take steps to minimize them. But even if you can’t, it’s important to know what to expect.

© 2024

Your businesses may have a choice between using the cash or accrual method of accounting for tax purposes. The cash method often provides significant tax benefits for those that qualify. However, some businesses may be better off using the accrual method. Therefore, you need to evaluate the tax accounting method for your business to ensure that it’s the most beneficial approach.

The current situation

“Small businesses,” as defined by the tax code, are generally eligible to use either cash or accrual accounting for tax purposes. (Some businesses may also be eligible to use various hybrid approaches.) Before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) took effect, the gross receipts threshold for classification as a small business varied from $1 million to $10 million depending on how a business was structured, its industry and whether inventory was a material income-producing factor.

The TCJA simplified the definition of a small business by establishing a single gross receipts threshold. It also increased the threshold to $25 million (adjusted for inflation), expanding the benefits of small business status to many more companies. For 2024, a small business is one whose average annual gross receipts for the three-year period ending before the 2024 tax year are $30 million or less (up from $29 million in 2023).

In addition to eligibility for the cash method of accounting, small businesses enjoy simplified inventory accounting, exemption from the uniform capitalization rules and the business interest deduction limit, and several other tax advantages. Be aware that some businesses are eligible for cash accounting even if their gross receipts are above the threshold, including S corporations, partnerships without any C corporation partners, farming businesses and certain personal service corporations. Also, tax shelters are ineligible for the cash method, regardless of size.

Potential advantages

For most businesses, the cash method provides significant tax advantages. Because cash-basis businesses recognize income when it’s received and deduct expenses when they’re paid, they have greater control over the timing of income and deductions. For example, they can defer income by delaying invoices until the following tax year or shift deductions into the current year by accelerating the payment of expenses.

In contrast, accrual-basis businesses recognize income when it’s earned and deduct expenses when they’re incurred, without regard to the timing of cash receipts or payments. That means they have little flexibility to time the recognition of income or expenses for income tax purposes.

The cash method also provides cash flow benefits. Because income is taxed in the year it’s received, it helps ensure that a business has the funds it needs to pay its tax bill.

For some businesses, however, the accrual method may be preferable. For instance, if a company’s accrued income tends to be lower than its accrued expenses, the accrual method may result in lower tax liability than the cash method. Other potential advantages of using the accrual method include the abilities to deduct year-end bonuses paid within the first 2½ months of the following tax year and to defer taxes on certain advance payments.

Issues when switching methods

Even if your business would enjoy a tax advantage by switching from the accrual method to the cash method, or vice versa, it’s important to consider the administrative costs involved in making the change. For example, if your business prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), it’s required to use the accrual method for financial reporting purposes.

Does that mean you can’t use the cash method for tax purposes? No, but it would require the business to maintain two sets of books. Changing accounting methods for tax purposes may also require IRS approval. Contact us to learn more about each method.

© 2024

Navigating the complexities of tax law can be difficult, especially when faced with an unexpected tax bill due to the errors of a spouse or ex-spouse. The reason for such a bill has to do with the concept of “joint and several” liability. When a married couple files a joint tax return, each spouse is liable for the full amount of tax on the couple’s combined income. Therefore, the IRS can come after either spouse to collect the entire tax — not just the part that’s attributed to one spouse or the other. This includes any tax deficiency that the IRS assesses after an audit, as well as any penalties and interest.

There may be relief

In some cases, spouses are eligible for “innocent spouse relief.” This generally involves an individual who was unaware of a tax understatement that was attributable to his or her spouse. To qualify, you must show that you didn’t know about the understatement and that there was nothing that should have made you suspicious. In addition, the circumstances must make it inequitable to hold you liable for the tax.

This relief is available even if you’re still married and living with your spouse. In addition, individuals may be able to get relief for tax deficiencies on joint returns if they’re divorced, widowed, legally separated or living apart.

Recent court cases

Not surprisingly, the issue of innocent spouses is frequently litigated. Here are some cases from this year:

  • Taxpayer wins. In one case, it was undisputed that a married couple’s joint tax return included an understatement of tax. The IRS and the wife agreed that she didn’t know, or have reason to know, that the correct amount of taxes wasn’t paid. She wasn’t involved in her now ex-husband’s employment or business activities. He concealed his finances from her and kept separate bank accounts. The U.S. Tax Court weighed all factors and found it would be inequitable to hold her liable for the deficiency. Her request for innocent spouse relief was granted. (TC Memo 2024-26)
  • Taxpayer loses. In another case, a widow argued that if she paid the taxes owed by her deceased husband, she’d suffer economic hardship. Her annual income, she testified, was far below the poverty line and her assets were insufficient to pay the taxes. However, she failed to provide evidence to support her income or the value of her two homes. Records showed that while her income taxes remained unpaid, she enjoyed significant benefits, including several expensive vacations and the purchase of a luxury vehicle. The U.S. Tax Court denied her request for relief. (162 TC No. 2)

An “injured spouse”

In addition to innocent spouse relief, there’s also relief for an “injured spouse.” What’s the difference? An injured spouse claim asks the IRS to allocate part of a joint refund to one spouse. In these cases, all or part of an injured spouse’s refund from a joint return is applied against past-due federal tax, state tax, child or spousal support, or a federal nontax debt (such as a student loan) owed by the other spouse. If you’re an injured spouse, you may be able to recoup your share of the refund.

A challenging process

Whether, and to what extent, you can take advantage of the above relief depends on the facts of your situation. If you’re interested in trying to obtain relief, there’s paperwork that must be filed and deadlines that must be met. We can assist you with the details.

Also, keep “joint and several liability” in mind when filing future tax returns. Even if a joint return results in less tax, you may choose to file a separate return if you want to be certain you’re responsible only for your own tax. Contact us with any questions or concerns.

© 2024

Understanding taxes on real estate gains

Let’s say you own real estate that has been held for more than one year and is sold for a taxable gain. Perhaps this gain comes from indirect ownership of real estate via a pass-through entity such as an LLC, partnership or S corporation. You may expect to pay Uncle Sam the standard 15% or 20% federal income tax rate that usually applies to long-term capital gains from assets held for more than one year.

However, some real estate gains can be taxed at higher rates due to depreciation deductions. Here’s a rundown of the federal income tax issues that might be involved in real estate gains.

Vacant land

The current maximum federal long-term capital gain tax rate for a sale of vacant land is 20%. The 20% rate only hits those with high incomes. Specifically, if you’re a single filer in 2024, the 20% rate kicks in when your taxable income, including any land sale gain and any other long-term capital gains, exceeds $518,900. For a married joint-filing couple, the 20% rate kicks in when taxable income exceeds $583,750. For a head of household, the 20% rate kicks when your taxable income exceeds $551,350. If your income is below the applicable threshold, you won’t owe more than 15% federal tax on a land sale gain. However, you may also owe the 3.8% net investment income tax (NIIT) on some or all of the gain.

Gains from depreciation

Gain attributable to real estate depreciation calculated using the applicable straight-line method is called unrecaptured Section 1250 gain. This category of gain generally is taxed at a flat 25% federal rate, unless the gain would be taxed at a lower rate if it was simply included in your taxable income with no special treatment. You may also owe the 3.8% NIIT on some or all of the unrecaptured Section 1250 gain.

Gains from depreciable qualified improvement property

Qualified improvement property (QIP) generally means any improvement to an interior portion of a nonresidential building that’s placed in service after the date the building is placed in service. However, QIP does not include expenditures for the enlargement of the building, elevators, escalators or the building’s internal structural framework.

You can claim first-year Section 179 deductions or first-year bonus depreciation for QIP. When you sell QIP for which first-year Section 179 deductions have been claimed, gain up to the amount of the Section 179 deductions will be high-taxed Section 1245 ordinary income recapture. In other words, the gain will be taxed at your regular rate rather than at lower long-term gain rates. You may also owe the 3.8% NIIT on some or all of the Section 1245 recapture gain.

What if you sell QIP for which first-year bonus depreciation has been claimed? In this case, gain up to the excess of the bonus depreciation deduction over depreciation calculated using the applicable straight-line method will be high-taxed Section 1250 ordinary income recapture. Once again, the gain will be taxed at your regular rate rather than at lower long-term gain rates, and you may also owe the 3.8% NIIT on some or all of the recapture gain.

Tax planning point: If you opt for straight-line depreciation for real property, including QIP (in other words, you don’t claim first-year Section 179 or first-year bonus depreciation deductions), there won’t be any Section 1245 ordinary income recapture. There also won’t be any Section 1250 ordinary income recapture. Instead, you’ll only have unrecaptured Section 1250 gain from the depreciation, and that gain will be taxed at a federal rate of no more than 25%. However, you may also owe the 3.8% NIIT on all or part of the gain.

Plenty to consider

As you can see, the federal income tax rules for gains from sales of real estate may be more complicated than you thought. Different tax rates can apply to different categories of gain. And you may also owe the 3.8% NIIT and possibly state income tax, too. We will handle the details when we prepare your tax return. Contact us with questions about your situation.

© 2024